p dir=ltrIt wouldn’t be an exaggeration to claim that the resumption of peace talks between the Israeli government and the Palestinian Authority have thus far yielded nothing of value, at least not as far as settling the decades-long Palestinian-Israeli problem./p
p dir=ltrFor one, the media have paid the talks little attention, aside from the ceremonial coverage of the first round of talks in Washington on September 2. They barely noticed the following round in the Middle East, nearly two weeks later. What did capture the media’s attention was US President Barack Obama’s attempt to minimise the damage he invited upon himself for merely pressing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to issue a partial moratorium on settlement building (about 11 months ago), and then to e?tend the settlement freeze./p
p dir=ltrThe president of the United States failed, expectedly, to persuade Israeli leaders to uphold such a basic prerequisite to ensuring a smooth sailing peace process. Its resumption signalled the return of American diplomacy to the Middle East. Its current problems and expected failure, unlike previous rounds of talks, could very much usher the end of American political adventurism in the region. If a president like Obama - who once enjoyed such a massive national and international mandate - could weaken befor? a right-wing Israeli prime minister, then why should others even try?/p
p dir=ltrTo save face - and postpone failure - Obama has reportedly promised Israel broad security and diplomatic guarantees. All he asked for in return was the mere extension of the settlement moratorium of 60 days - enough to push his party through the November elections./p
p dir=ltrAccording to an article by David Makovsky, of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, the leaked letter from Obama to Netanyahu positions US foreign policy as a hostage to Israeli diktats, whereby the US makes no such future requests of settlement freeze, guarantees a US veto of any UN Security Council Resolution related to the peace talks for a year, agrees to increase pressure on Iran as per Israeli demands, and so on./p
p dir=ltrAmong the many disturbing pledges made by the Obama administration, one seems particularly generous. According to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, the US will “accept the legitimacy of Israel’s security needs as defined by the Netanyahu government, referring apparently to the Israeli leader’s demand for a long-term Israeli military presence in the eastern West Bank, along the border with Jordan”./p
p dir=ltrFor Obama to lease his country’s political influence to a foreign state for cheap political gain is bad enough. To achieve personal and party political goals at the expense of the national interest of the country is equally disturbing. But to promise a lasting military presence of an occupying power in another people’s land for a mere 60-day settlement freeze is completely unethical and illogical. Furthermore, it violates international law. This letter will some day be analysed and placed in the same categ?ry as the Balfour Declaration of 1917, when a Jewish homeland was promised by Britain to a group of European Zionists in historic Palestine – even when neither group had ownership rights or any political mandate./p
p dir=ltrObama’s passionate speech in Cairo, in June 2009, was titled “A new beginning”. But a year and few months later, Obama has learned the limits of the political overreach of his country when it comes to Israel - as much as the Iraq war has demonstrated the limits of military power./p
p dir=ltrWith this new wisdom, Obama and his advisers are acting like desperate salesmen before a conceited, dispassionate tourist. All Obama needs is a bit of time and Netanyahu is haggling over every detail to ensure maximum value for his dollar before November 2. Then, Israel will find other ways to use whatever leverage it has to advance its interests./p
p dir=ltrBecause Israeli leaders also understand that in times like this Washington is absolutely mute and meek, Tel Aviv is sparing no efforts to exploit the situation. At home, Netanyahu is flexing his muscles to impress his influential right-wing constituency by approving hundreds of new housing units in illegally occupied Arab East Jerusalem. Netanyahu has humbled the president of the “free world”, and is enjoying every moment of it./p
p dir=ltrMoreover, new racist laws are either passing or are scheduled for vote in the Israeli Knesset. One of these demands allegiance to Israel as “a Jewish and democratic state”. Many will have to take that oath or lose their citizenship rights in the country. It is an undemocratic law by every account, and is aimed largely at the Palestinian Christian and Muslim population, the natives of that land. The timing of this legislation is also meant to underscore Israel’s determination to do whatever it deems necessa?y, which will serve the right-wing parties in Israel very well in future elections./p
p dir=ltrAs for Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, there is little to be said. He has no political power, leverage or influence. He can only do as he is told. He might send out the occasional threat of quitting political life, but frankly few are paying attention or are worried about that possibility./p
p dir=ltrHowever, Abbas has, perhaps inadvertently, helped Netanyahu by providing him with a political platform whereby the Israeli leader can claim to be engaged in a legitimate peace process with a Palestinian partner. This alone was enough to bring Netanyahu and his country from back political oblivion to the centre stage of international diplomacy. The bloodbath that Israel unleashed on Gaza from 2008 to 2009, the ongoing siege, the killing of activists abroad the Freedom Flotilla have all been cast aside for n?w. Instead, we listen to Netanyahu speak of peace, prosperity and security for all, amid hearty clapping and standing ovations./p
p dir=ltrHundreds of Israeli speakers, politicians, diplomats and scholars have been circling the globe in recent months, talking about Israel’s undying commitment to peace. While this goes on, Israeli bulldozers are back in full gear, tearing down houses, businesses and olive groves. Israel continues to expand settlements and build what is rightly termed the apartheid wall, all with little, if any, criticism from the US, the self-declared honest peace broker. Worse, as much as the political theatre is organised an? financed by US dollars, the full-scale destruction taking place in the West Bank and East Jerusalem is also courtesy of US coffers. Such is the self-defeating policy of the United States. Such is the peace process./p